Any feedback?
Please rate this page
(literature.php)
(0/150)

BRENDA support

Literature summary for 3.4.23.5 extracted from

  • Canduri, F.; Ward, R.J.; de Azevedo, W.F.; Gomes, R.A.S.; Arni, R.K.
    Purification and partial characterization of cathepsin D from porcine (Sus scrofa) liver using affinity chromatography (1998), Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int., 45, 797-803.
    View publication on PubMed

Localization

Localization Comment Organism GeneOntology No. Textmining
lysosome
-
Sus scrofa 5764
-

Molecular Weight [Da]

Molecular Weight [Da] Molecular Weight Maximum [Da] Comment Organism
15000
-
x * 15000 + x * 30000, SDS-PAGE under reducing and denaturing conditions Sus scrofa
30000
-
x * 15000 + x * 30000, SDS-PAGE under reducing and denaturing conditions Sus scrofa
45000
-
x * 45000, SDS-PAGE Sus scrofa

Organism

Organism UniProt Comment Textmining
Sus scrofa
-
pig
-

Purification (Commentary)

Purification (Comment) Organism
-
Sus scrofa

Source Tissue

Source Tissue Comment Organism Textmining
liver
-
Sus scrofa
-

Substrates and Products (Substrate)

Substrates Comment Substrates Organism Products Comment (Products) Rev. Reac.
Hemoglobin + H2O
-
Sus scrofa ?
-
?

Subunits

Subunits Comment Organism
? x * 45000, SDS-PAGE Sus scrofa
? x * 15000 + x * 30000, SDS-PAGE under reducing and denaturing conditions Sus scrofa

pH Optimum

pH Optimum Minimum pH Optimum Maximum Comment Organism
2.5 3 hemoglobin Sus scrofa

pH Range

pH Minimum pH Maximum Comment Organism
2 5 pH 2.0: about 95% of maximal activity, pH 5.0: about 35% of maximal activity Sus scrofa